/Contents [453 0 R 454 0 R 455 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) 231 0 obj /P 12 0 R /S /P /Lang (EN-US) 318 0 obj << 132 0 obj /A 524 0 R /P 12 0 R 131 0 obj endobj /Pg 16 0 R 74 0 obj Box 30758 . >> /Contents [479 0 R 480 0 R 481 0 R] /K 18 /Rotate 0 /K 12 0 R << >> /Length 532 0 R endobj /P 531 0 R /Lang (EN-US) << >> /P 280 0 R 35 [192 0 R 193 0 R 194 0 R 195 0 R 196 0 R 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R 7 0 obj endobj /Lang (EN-US) /Annots [457 0 R 458 0 R] /K 17 /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) 298 0 obj /S /P /P 12 0 R endobj 311 0 obj /S /TOCI 125 0 obj /Parent 3 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /P 123 0 R /Parent 6 0 R /K [500 0 R 501 0 R 502 0 R] /S /Reference /K 1 /K 2 /Pg 45 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 351 0 obj /P 12 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) >> /Pg 19 0 R 85 0 obj endobj /Pg 32 0 R /Parent 3 0 R /S /Reference >> /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Lang (EN-US) /K 18 357 0 obj /Pg 27 0 R 24 [156 0 R 157 0 R] /Annots [] /Type /Page /S /P /S /Reference /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 22 0 R 187 0 R 188 0 R 189 0 R 190 0 R 191 0 R 192 0 R 193 0 R 194 0 R 195 0 R 196 0 R << 180 0 obj 356 0 obj endobj 253 0 obj /Type /Page /K 0 /S /P endobj /K 18 /Pg 15 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Tabs /S 167 0 obj endobj /S /P /S /P 1 / Employees of the U.S. Department of Justice have no authority to testify until the procedures set forth in 28 C.F.R. >> /S /P >> << /Pg 27 0 R /P 162 0 R 44 0 obj 0000008092 00000 n << endobj Id. 309 0 R 308 0 R null 310 0 R 311 0 R 310 0 R null 312 0 R null 57 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) >> /Pg 44 0 R 360 0 obj 295 0 obj endobj /S /TOCI /Pg 15 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 45 0 R /Lang (EN-US) According to the Colorado Supreme Court, however, a court may not disqualify counsel on the basis of speculation or conjecture.. /P 55 0 R /Pg 18 0 R In Brothers, the defendants tried to disqualify the prosecuting attorneys for being potential trial witnesses because the prosecutors had participated in a meeting in which the defendant was offered immunity. >> startxref /K 4 /S /P Following this, they have two options - either to transfer the case to another judge immediately or to file a written answer with the clerk. >> /P 302 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 155 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., No. /Pg 20 0 R endobj << 245 0 obj /Rotate 0 << endobj /Lang (EN-US) endobj /K 0 /S /P >> << /P 12 0 R << /K 23 >> /Pg 27 0 R /ParentTreeNextKey 43 /P 12 0 R /K 28 << /S /TOCI /Pg 22 0 R The defendant has moved to have prosecutors Mark Rosman and Karen Sharp disqualified from conducting the trial in this matter due to the ethical prohibition against a lawyer conducting a trial in which he or she will be a necessary witness. endobj File the forms. /K 19 /Parent 8 0 R /S /P >> 6. << /K 3 /K 2 343 0 obj /S /P /K 1 264 0 obj >> >> disqualify opposing counsel, the present client of the attorney who is the target of the motion,6 and third parties. /Rotate 0 /P 12 0 R endobj /P 12 0 R 191 0 R] 127 0 obj 41 0 obj >> See Rule 2.330 (f). /Lang (EN-US) endobj << /K 13 >> /P 12 0 R >> Here, two FBI agents were present during the defendant's meeting with the prosecutors and are available to testify as to what took place during the meeting. endobj /S /P Because motions to disqualify seek to deprive the opposing endobj Attorneys understandably may feel apprehensive about the threat of a motion to disqualify, given the potential risk and loss of work. 9 [87 0 R 88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R 91 0 R 92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R 95 0 R 96 0 R /K 8 /P 531 0 R h[o\{ C@9\`d-X" ?[]&5>fR*UVSO?>|/qnou':._^:WZ.Z.Fw7w/>{_?xw?>G}N/_>}}z>xVp~/zOy_}xwMQm|_}{}?^~'v>'_]/Fkum-i^iz]:JZ_^_^_^_^_^_Y_Y_Y_Yu|]u|}u_5wuRWmVmVmV:C:C:P:~ /]2Vcu9Vcu9Vcu9.X][oW2WWsu5WWs\>rt=9u8Zk[s~VWZNNNNNNiuuu~m^|])^)^)^yuNNNNZuu&?:wmO]$uMuM7~vz?u=uHs[P;?D[R;of}f[oCchO\o^=7o?]N+B/r^No~{>#n?'_~xp@x."Zyc4k4&omcVmnX:5oM[iKfz&lrQ,eM,~e? /Parent 7 0 R Sharp ("Defendant's Motion"). /Resources 411 0 R /P 12 0 R /S /P /StructParents 30 Courts also appear to distinguish between conflicts based on multiple representations and those based on successive representations.5 After all, parties filing disqualification motions based on multiple representation conflicts are typically strangers to the attorneyclient relationship. /S /P /K 6 /P 509 0 R ,"w0:IYbJ!`.^OtX]8Xhyi(< 1+!)CafX>2p1D0UXrA!iP2j\ endobj >> endobj endobj 111 0 obj 35 0 obj << /S /P endobj Prohibition is used as the justification for allowing judges to rule on their own motions to disqualify, as attorneys are given another means to have a judge disqualified. /Pg 27 0 R endobj /P 12 0 R >> /S /P endobj endobj /K 2 /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) >> /S /P /P 508 0 R endobj << /P 12 0 R endobj 3 Rules 4-1.6, 4-1.7, and 4-1.9 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar generally govern in attorney conflict of interest disqualification matters. /P 12 0 R /Artifact /P /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Parent 11 0 R See People ex rel. 129 0 obj Mealey's (February 27, 2023, 2:08 PM EST) -- WHEELING, W.Va. A federal judge in West Virginia denied a hydraulic fracturing company's second attempt to disqualify the counsel for landowners in a dispute over abandoned wells, ruling that there is no ethical violation on the part of the fracking operator's former employee Bryan "Wayne . In assessing motions to disqualify based on conflicts, Colorado courts also consider (1) a clients preference for a particular counsel, (2) the clients right to confidentiality in communications with his or her attorney, (3) the integrity of the judicial process, and (4) the nature of the particular conflict of interest involved.10 Below are some important concepts that have emerged in the context of motions to disqualify.11, The Colorado Rules do not bar attorneys from representing current clients against former clients. United States v. Wallach, 788 F. Supp. 13. 152 0 obj 314 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) >> Motion to Disqualify - 4 should include disqualifying an attorney for a party for conflicts of interest under the RPCs. /S /P 106 0 obj 322 0 obj >> at 390-91. /Pg 28 0 R /K 19 stream << >> Almost five years later, the Wife's former counsel filed a notice of appearance, and on December 29, 2016, almost seven years after the initial motion was filed, the Wife filed a "renewed motion to disqualify." The 2016 motion alleged not only that the Husband's attorney prepared the agreement and would be a /K 2 /Pg 29 0 R /P 55 0 R /S /P endobj << >> /K 12 >> Response to Motion to Disqualify Counsel and Law Firm [Doc. >> 12. 333 0 obj endobj /Pg 27 0 R /S /Link endobj /P 12 0 R /Resources 428 0 R endobj /P 12 0 R /Pg 15 0 R 12 0 obj The call did not result in an attorney-client relationship of any nature or duration between Steve Morris or his law firm and Chinois or any 4 5 6 endobj /Lang (EN-US) 81 0 R 314 0 R 81 0 R 82 0 R 83 0 R] /StructParents 12 >> /Lang (EN-US) /K 3 << NME's motion was based on the confidences that it had imparted to the attorney in the prior representation under a joint defense agreement. /Lang (EN-US) Therefore, the defendant's Motion to Disqualify the prosecutors should be denied. /P 274 0 R /K 0 >> /Pg 22 0 R /P 124 0 R Attorneys should not assume that possession of mere playbook knowledge precludes disqualification. 57 0 obj First, identify and resolve potential conflicts, including both multiple and successive representations, before undertaking a representation or hiring a lateral. >> /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R endobj The government does not contest the fact that prosecutors Mark Rosman and Karen Sharp met with the defendant on June 21, 1995, and that the defendant was offered immunity, which he declined to accept. /Lang (EN-US) /K 4 178 0 obj 303 0 obj 0000009454 00000 n /Contents [429 0 R 430 0 R 431 0 R] /Pg 19 0 R 186 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) endobj /S /P >> << U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ANTITRUST DIVISION 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Rm. 174 0 obj >> /Lang (EN-US) /Count 32 /Resources 440 0 R /K [38 293 0 R 40] /S /P /StructParents 22 endobj /Pg 46 0 R /S /P 140 0 obj endobj /S /P 37 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) << endobj /Pg 22 0 R /K 13 168 0 obj << /Pg 15 0 R /S /P /S /Link /StructParents 29 /Type /Page /K 15 /P 134 0 R /Pg 22 0 R >> /P 508 0 R /StructParents 19 << /Pg 42 0 R /P 509 0 R /S /P << /P 12 0 R >> See also Harlan, 54 P.3d at 877 (the Court noted that [i]n determining whether disqualification is warranted the critical question is whether the litigation can be conducted in fairness to all parties and explained that [d]isqualification should not be imposed unless the claimed misconduct in some way taints the trial or legal system) (quoting Fed. . 195 0 obj endobj 91 0 obj ANSWER or RESPONSE DATE. /Pg 22 0 R /K 43 338 0 obj 128 0 obj On the contrary, a defendant must demonstrate a compelling and legitimate need to do so. 4 [58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R 64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R 67 0 R /P 531 0 R >> << In the motion, Petitioner alleged he was . /Pg 22 0 R 26 [160 0 R 161 0 R 162 0 R null 327 0 R null 328 0 R null 329 0 R 162 0 R << << /Resources 462 0 R 148 0 obj << >> >> 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R] /K 1 /P 528 0 R /K 6 >> /Tabs /S The facts stated in Mrs. Landes' Response to the Motion to Disqualify, are true and correct, including the fact that I do not have Mr. Cuzdey's client file. 133 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /P 528 0 R /S /P << Drew Mazzeo and his firm should be disqualified from further representation of Landes in this matter, due to ethical obligations toward Cuzdey as a former client, incurred when Mr. Mazzeo purchased the practice of endobj endobj /P 508 0 R /P 12 0 R This website and its publications are not designed to provide legal or other advice and you should not take, or refrain from taking, action based on its content. /StructParents 3 108 0 obj 149 0 obj You need a written motion signed by both your client and yourself, and sworn to by your client. /S /P >> << by plaintiff Plaintiffs motion is unsupported by any applicable legal authority and is not . /K [30 289 0 R 32] 147 0 R 148 0 R 149 0 R 150 0 R 151 0 R 152 0 R 153 0 R 154 0 R 155 0 R 156 0 R /Annots [] 0 65 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R /K 0 /S /P Colo. RPC 1.9 does not define a substantially related matter,. endobj /P 506 0 R unless the client consents after disclosure to the . Co. v. Employers Ins. /Pg 43 0 R 86 0 obj /S /P 17, 2020), the Central District of California decided a motion to disqualify brought by the defendant based on two grounds: (1) a purported conflict based on plaintiff's counsel's prior employment by the defendant; and (2) plaintiff's counsel's improper receipt of information, procured >> /K 4 /P 531 0 R /S /P /CropBox [0 0 612 792] << /Pg 20 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /PageLayout /OneColumn << /Lang (EN-US) << /Parent 10 0 R 158 0 obj /K 1 /S /P endobj /P 12 0 R By letter dated June 10, 1997, the defendant made a demand pursuant to 28 C.F.R. /K 6 31 0 obj 232 0 obj 281 0 obj << >> 10. >> /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 17 0 R /S /P /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R /Pg 30 0 R endobj /K 51 >> /S /P /Lang (EN-US) >> >> 130 0 obj /K 1 << >> >> << /Type /Page Beddow, Erben & Bowen, P.A Second Floor - 2019 Building 2019 3rd Avenue, North Birmingham, AL 35203. Moreover, other witnesses are available to testify about the contested facts on which the defendant's Motion is based. endobj /Pg 41 0 R /K 1 /P 12 0 R 175 0 obj 328 0 obj endobj /Pg 22 0 R /P 12 0 R >> /K 11 /Lang (EN-US) 236 0 obj endobj 282 0 obj endobj endobj << 1 [233 0 R 234 0 R 235 0 R 236 0 R 237 0 R 238 0 R 239 0 R 240 0 R 241 0 R 242 0 R << 89 0 obj /K 26 /Pg 17 0 R << /Type /Page << >> << endobj /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 25 0 R /Lang (EN-US) hb```c``X8c*}"3=O62ke'\9(8b /Lang (EN-US) If you are not already a client of Dentons, please do not send us any confidential information. /Lang (EN-US) /S /Link Co. v. Isham, 782 F.Supp. /ModDate (D:20190627090514-04'00') /Annots [] /Pg 44 0 R /Rotate 0 /Pg 44 0 R 12 [115 0 R 116 0 R 117 0 R] 2023 Dentons. /Lang (EN-US) endobj /Type /Page /Type /Page /K 1 /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] >> /Parent 10 0 R /Pg 24 0 R /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /K 10 . 62 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) endobj /Type /Page endobj /Pg 28 0 R /K [2 275 0 R 4] /Lang (EN-US) << /StructParents 16 >> Defendant's Motion at 1-3. << /Lang (EN-US) << endobj 29 0 obj /P 12 0 R /K 23 endobj An oral motion on the record, by an attorney of record, IS a formal motion, even if not accepted and demanded by the court to be submitted in writing. /P 508 0 R /P 55 0 R << People v. Harlan, 54 P.3d 871, 877 (Colo. 2002). << /Lang (EN-US) /Kids [30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R 34 0 R] >> /Pg 16 0 R Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. << /Resources 448 0 R >> >> /Pg 22 0 R /Pg 45 0 R Ensure that the info you add to the Motion To Disqualify Counsel Sample Texas is up-to-date and accurate. 97 0 obj A motion to disqualify should be made with "reasonable promptness" after the party becomes aware of the conflict so that it cannot be used as a strategic tool to deprive his opponent of counsel after a substantial amount of time has been spent on a case. << In Sacramento, the . /S /P 0000006178 00000 n Terre Du Lac Property Owners' Ass'n, Inc. v. Shrum, 661 S.W.2d 45, 48 (Mo. /S /P /S /Footnote 336 0 obj /Parent 7 0 R /K 14 /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 15 0 R 214 0 obj /Pg 46 0 R /K 5 >> 241 0 obj II. endobj >> endobj /K [11 511 0 R] /P 133 0 R /K 0 157 0 obj >> << 342 0 obj endobj /Lang (EN-US) endobj /K 14 /Pg 17 0 R 238 0 obj /Pg 37 0 R very brief. >> /K 11 endobj /Lang (EN-US) >> /Pg 18 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /ParentTree 13 0 R 302 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 17 0 R endstream endobj startxref /Annots [] endobj >> /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /K 14 308 0 obj endobj << 197 0 obj /K 33 << endobj /Footnote /Note /K 0 /Pg 31 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 44 0 R /Type /Page Under the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct (Colorado Rules or Colo. RCP), an attorney must safeguard client confidences and secrets, subject to a few exceptions.2 The attorney is also obligated to elevate the clients interests above the interests of the attorney and the law firm. /K 12 /S /P endobj endobj /Lang (EN-US) 42 0 obj /P 12 0 R 16.23(c) to the U.S. Department of Justice for the testimony of Mark Rosman and Karen Sharp. /P 55 0 R endobj >> << /Type /Page Introduction /Pg 16 0 R /K 8 /S /Sect 142 0 obj endobj >> Dec. 16, 2014) (the court noted that [m]otions to disqualify opposing counsel are viewed with suspicion). /Pg 26 0 R /Pg 15 0 R endobj << /K 1 /Lang (EN-US) /K 16 /K 4 >> /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 8 0 obj /S /TOCI endobj /S /P Two important pre-motion strategies are effective. /Pg 46 0 R >> 255 0 obj endobj /P 296 0 R << /S /P >> << /P 12 0 R endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /P 12 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) /S /P 154 0 obj /K [14 523 0 R] /P 12 0 R /Pg 45 0 R /Lang (EN-US) Attempting to defeat the motion without advising the client is not an acceptable solution. << /Lang (EN-US) 283 0 obj /K 12 160 0 obj endobj /Pg 21 0 R 256 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /K 0 /S /H1 /S /Reference With respect to the events that occurred during the prosecutors' meeting with the defendant, it is not essential that the prosecuting attorneys testify at trial. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 284 0 obj endobj /TextBox /Art /S /P /P 12 0 R 3 [null 304 0 R 305 0 R 304 0 R null 306 0 R 307 0 R 306 0 R null 308 0 R << << /Pg 17 0 R 161), filed on October 7, 2020" . endobj >> 192 0 obj /K 3 /Pg 27 0 R /Rotate 0 >> << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] >> /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /S /P << /Pg 17 0 R endobj /Annots [] << endobj /Pg 16 0 R << Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. 97 0 R 98 0 R 99 0 R 100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R 103 0 R 104 0 R 105 0 R] /S /Reference 92 0 obj 113 0 obj endobj << /K [8 525 0 R] /K [8 510 0 R] /P 508 0 R /P 509 0 R endobj /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /Type /Page /Pg 16 0 R /Parent 8 0 R >> 363 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R endobj >> endobj /dc43kgm@9{Q CF";dlx23H(k)+BH0s0~SxDmSKfy~x|}w"l'%%o2nrQr>VKwLB3=_KJgZ%'$(":xPU.m99(+'&{Mj4k%'5CS@w7)05eX G?A*hR'*X\r^nDb'OAWMRd.ZEOp:|ECldHP?=[U'UjdW'f}\&D]J}r). /K 4 /Lang (EN-US) /S /P >> 325 0 obj /P 55 0 R 83 0 obj /K 19 Fill out the forms. Motion to Disqualify an Attorney in Florida What Is a Motion to Disqualify an Attorney? /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 30 0 R He also made /Pg 15 0 R /S /P << /K 8 >> Mark White, Esq. endobj endobj /Pg 28 0 R /StructParents 17 >> >> /Lang (EN-US) trailer << /S /P >> endobj /S /P << /P 506 0 R Motions to disqualify are far from rare occurrences. /P 529 0 R gov%2Fdoc1%2F031119586589 &label=Case+Filing. /Contents [483 0 R 484 0 R 485 0 R] >> /S /P 82 0 obj /S /P /K 17 /S /P /Pg 15 0 R /Resources 387 0 R /Resources 456 0 R 4. Select the Sign tool and create an electronic signature. >> endobj /Pg 16 0 R >> gdYBC;:::@Jht Mkhml$Y*$&\@$#m ` D*e d!$4RLd` /K 20 /K 1 >> endobj endobj /K 0 << /Pg 16 0 R endobj /S /P /P 163 0 R /K [304 0 R 306 0 R 308 0 R 310 0 R 312 0 R] /P 12 0 R 47 0 obj /K 2 endobj << 126 0 obj 00021 Motion to Strike Defendant BRIAN FROST's Affirmative Defenses. /P 508 0 R /K 0 << /Pg 15 0 R in writing. << /P 12 0 R endobj /Lang (EN-US) /StructTreeRoot 4 0 R In recent months, a number of high-profile disqualification motions have been reported.1 Many disqualification motions are well-founded. Conflict violations are not always the focal point for resolution of a motion to disqualify. /Lang (EN-US) << /S /P 254 0 obj /K 32 /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R << 324 0 R null 325 0 R 132 0 R 326 0 R 134 0 R] endobj endobj endobj >> >> /S /Table /P 12 0 R 0000001952 00000 n /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 20 0 R >> /P 508 0 R >> /Tabs /S >> /Lang (EN-US) << 176 0 obj /Annots [423 0 R 424 0 R] /Pg 22 0 R 220 0 obj /P 508 0 R 13 [118 0 R 119 0 R 120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R] /Type /Pages endobj << /K 1 1992). >> I am over twenty-one (21) years of age and am competent to make this affidavit. /P 12 0 R /S /Reference 347 0 obj /S /H1 /K 13 << /P 505 0 R /Rotate 0 << /Pg 15 0 R /Pg 17 0 R >> /K 5 << /CropBox [0 0 612 792] >> << 107 0 obj endobj << << << /Pg 15 0 R /P 12 0 R /K 8 endobj >> /S /TOCI /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Contents [467 0 R 468 0 R 469 0 R] /Pg 15 0 R /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R endobj << >> /P 509 0 R 1, WSBA Public Information on Mary Ann Strickler). /S /H3 /Tabs /S /Parent 6 0 R /S /P 96 0 obj /Tabs /S /S /P Tenorio moves to supplement his Response to the Department's Motion for Summary Judgment with two cases: Jordan v. /K 41 /Pg 19 0 R endobj /Type /Pages endobj 288 0 obj << 294 0 obj /S /P 246 0 obj /P 12 0 R /K 9 /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /Resources 466 0 R /S /P /K 3 /Lang (EN-US) HWYoF~G-I\#3 -*;Y^4N&GS/^N'jp09AYr3AG8Qw&ci`UyaFGjQ`H >pt$jxGON@QN]K+t(+|Z6*/@I f%4@Pygv,)23 j8[-h5y$#,Y+9Z2!CK >O6H)jF}ZA|k>&dn[1*.~.>u50,@Wt?fOG# i?k@;)d1GfzN]^;{f"U}2`%dC!5}| _Phf"HjjIzj[NC /K 10 /P 12 0 R 226 0 obj >> /P 508 0 R /Parent 6 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 0000006483 00000 n /Pg 19 0 R 63 0 obj /Pg 45 0 R /Annots [] /K 3 endobj >> /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R 9 0 obj /S /H3 /P 531 0 R /Lang (EN-US) endobj %PDF-1.6 % endobj << /Lang (EN-US) 28 [169 0 R 170 0 R] 335 0 obj /Pg 22 0 R /Tabs /S /Pg 45 0 R /K 0 << /K 8 %PDF-1.6 General Use: Description. White, Dunn & Booker 1200 First Alabama Bank Building Birmingham, AL 32503, Albert C. Bowen, Esq.
Dolores Charles Obituary,
How Long Will I Test Positive After Having Covid,
Putnam County Pistol Permit References,
Lawrence, Ks Mortuary Obituaries,
Articles R